From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mazloom v. Navient Sol. (In re Mazloom)

United States District Court, N.D. New York
May 5, 2023
18-60206-06-dd (N.D.N.Y. May. 5, 2023)

Opinion

18-60206-06-dd 07-30439-5 23-cv-00437 Adv. Pro. 20-80033-6

05-05-2023

In re STEPHANIE MAZLOOM, Debtor v. Navient Solutions, LLC and Navient Credit Finance Corporation, Defendants. In re: ROBERT A. CRANDALL AND MOLLY S. CRANDALL, Debtors Stephanie Mazloom, Robert A. Crandall and Molly S. Crandall, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, Stephanie Mazloom, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Navient Solutions, LLC and Navient Credit Finance Corporation, Defendants.

George F. Carpinello Adam R. Shaw Jenna C. Smith BOIES SCHILLER FLEXNER LLP Jason W. Burge (admitted pro hac vice) Lara Richards (to be admitted pro hac vice) FISHMAN HAYGOOD LLP Lynn E. Swanson (admitted pro hac vice) Lindsay E. Reeves (to be admitted pro hac vice) JONES SWANSON HUDDELL LLC Counsel for Plaintiffs Philip A. Goldstein McGuireWoods LLP Thomas M. Farrell (pro hac vice) McGuireWoods LLP JPMorgan Chase Tower K.Elizabeth Sieg (pro hac vice) McGuireWoods LLP Gateway Plaza Counsel for Defendants


George F. Carpinello Adam R. Shaw Jenna C. Smith BOIES SCHILLER FLEXNER LLP Jason W. Burge (admitted pro hac vice) Lara Richards (to be admitted pro hac vice) FISHMAN HAYGOOD LLP Lynn E. Swanson (admitted pro hac vice) Lindsay E. Reeves (to be admitted pro hac vice) JONES SWANSON HUDDELL LLC Counsel for Plaintiffs

Philip A. Goldstein McGuireWoods LLP Thomas M. Farrell (pro hac vice) McGuireWoods LLP JPMorgan Chase Tower K.Elizabeth Sieg (pro hac vice) McGuireWoods LLP Gateway Plaza Counsel for Defendants

STIPULATION AND JOINT MOTION STAYING PROCEEDINGS

David N. Hued U.S. District Judge

Plaintiffs Stephanie Mazloom, Robert A. Crandall, and Molly S. Crandall (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) and Defendants Navient Solutions, LLC and Navient Credit Finance Corporation (collectively, “Defendants” and with Plaintiffs, the “Parties”), by and through undersigned counsel, hereby file this stipulation and joint motion (this “Stipulation”) to stay the proceedings in the above-captioned matter.

In light of the settlement in principle in another case, Woodard v. Navient Solutions, LLC, Adv. Pro. No. 21-08023 (Bankr. D. Neb.), which would encompass all the claims raised between the parties in the above-captioned case, and to allow time for the Woodard parties to reduce the settlement in principle to a final definitive agreement and for the Parties to determine whether the above-captioned action should be maintained, the Parties agree and jointly move that all proceedings in the above-captioned matter be stayed for sixty (60) days.

NOW, THEREFORE, UPON THE FOREGOING RECITALS, WHICH ARE INCORPORATED AS THOUGH FULLY SET FORTH HEREIN, IT HEREBY IS STIPULATED AND AGREED, BY AND BETWEEN THE PARTIES, THROUGH THE UNDERSIGNED, THAT:

1. The Parties hereby jointly move the Court to stay the proceedings in the above-captioned action for sixty (60) days.

2. The Parties shall report to the Court within sixty (60) days as to the status of the proposed settlement.

IS SO ORDERED


Summaries of

Mazloom v. Navient Sol. (In re Mazloom)

United States District Court, N.D. New York
May 5, 2023
18-60206-06-dd (N.D.N.Y. May. 5, 2023)
Case details for

Mazloom v. Navient Sol. (In re Mazloom)

Case Details

Full title:In re STEPHANIE MAZLOOM, Debtor v. Navient Solutions, LLC and Navient…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. New York

Date published: May 5, 2023

Citations

18-60206-06-dd (N.D.N.Y. May. 5, 2023)