From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Maz Medics, Inc. v. Satellite Advertising Systems, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Feb 20, 1990
391 S.E.2d 446 (Ga. Ct. App. 1990)

Summary

affirming award of prejudgment interest on judgment entered pursuant to liquidated damages clause in contract

Summary of this case from Sovereign Healthcare, LLC v. Mariner Health Care Management Co.

Opinion

A89A2301.

DECIDED FEBRUARY 20, 1990.

Action on contract. DeKalb State Court. Before Judge McLaughlin.

Charles L. Day, for appellant.

Steven M. Youngelson, Leslie J. Cardin, for appellee.


Appellee-plaintiff contracted to produce and have aired certain television commercials for appellant-defendant's business. The contract contained a liquidated damages provision and, after appellant breached the contract, appellee brought suit. The trial court, sitting as the trior of fact, found that the liquidated damages provision of the contract was enforceable. Judgment was entered for appellee and appellant appeals from that judgment.

1. Appellant enumerates the general grounds, urging that the contractual provision for liquidated damages is an unenforceable penalty.

"[A]t trial, the burden is on the defaulting party to show that the provision is a penalty. [Cit.]... [T]he enforceability of a liquidated-damages provision in a contract is a question of law for the court ... which necessarily requires the resolution of questions of fact." Liberty Life Ins. Co. v. Thomas B. Hartley Constr. Co., 258 Ga. 808, 809 ( 375 S.E.2d 222) (1989). The evidence authorized the trial court to find that appellee's damages would be difficult to assess with accuracy, that the parties' intent was to provide for damages rather than a penalty, and that the amount specified was a reasonable pre-estimation of appellee's probable loss. Southeastern Land Fund v. Real Estate World, 237 Ga. 227, 230 ( 227 S.E.2d 340) (1976). See also Daniels v. Johnson, 191 Ga. App. 70, 71 (1) ( 381 S.E.2d 87) (1989).

2. Appellant's second enumeration of error regarding the trial court's award of prejudgment interest is without merit. OCGA § 7-4-15; Considine Co. of Ga. v. Turner Communications Corp., 155 Ga. App. 911, 915 (6) ( 273 S.E.2d 652) (1980).

Judgment affirmed. McMurray, P. J., and Beasley, J., concur.

DECIDED FEBRUARY 20, 1990.


Summaries of

Maz Medics, Inc. v. Satellite Advertising Systems, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Feb 20, 1990
391 S.E.2d 446 (Ga. Ct. App. 1990)

affirming award of prejudgment interest on judgment entered pursuant to liquidated damages clause in contract

Summary of this case from Sovereign Healthcare, LLC v. Mariner Health Care Management Co.

considering whether evidence supported trial court's factual findings on tripartite inquiry after bench trial on enforceability of liquidated damages provision

Summary of this case from Gwinnett Clinic, Ltd. v. Boaten
Case details for

Maz Medics, Inc. v. Satellite Advertising Systems, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:MAZ MEDICS, INC. v. SATELLITE ADVERTISING SYSTEMS, INC

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Feb 20, 1990

Citations

391 S.E.2d 446 (Ga. Ct. App. 1990)
391 S.E.2d 446

Citing Cases

Sovereign Healthcare, LLC v. Mariner Health Care Management Co.

Based upon OCGA § 7–4–15's plain language, Mariner is entitled to prejudgment interest. See Maz Medics v.…

Gwinnett Clinic, Ltd. v. Boaten

Although the enforceability of a liquidated damages provision is a question of law, the above "tripartite…