Mayo v. Technical Transp.

Full title: WILLIAM MAYO APPELLANT v. TECHNICAL TRANSPORTATION APPELLEE

Court: COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

Date published: Mar 15, 2012

NO. 02-11-00331-CV (Tex. App. Mar. 15, 2012)

Opinion

NO. 02-11-00331-CV

03-15-2012

WILLIAM MAYO APPELLANT v. TECHNICAL TRANSPORTATION APPELLEE

PER CURIAM

FROM THE 352ND DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

MEMORANDUM OPINION¹ AND JUDGMENT

1

We have considered the parties' "Agreed Motion For Remand." The motion is GRANTED. We set aside, without regard to the merits, the trial court's judgment and remand this case to the trial court for further proceedings in accordance with the parties' agreement. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(2)(B); Innovative Office Sys., Inc. v. Johnson, 911 S.W. 2d 387, 388 (Tex. 1995); In re Ortega, 225 S.W.3d 610, 610-11 (Tex. App.—El Paso 2006, no pet.).

Costs of the appeal shall be paid by the party incurring the same, for which let execution issue. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: DAUPHINOT, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ.

See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.