From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mayo v. Smith

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
May 24, 2012
No. 3:11-CV-00807 (M.D. Pa. May. 24, 2012)

Opinion

No. 3:11-CV-00807

05-24-2012

WARREN MAYO Plaintiff, v. CHRIS SMITH and MICHAELWELSH Defendants


(JUDGE CAPUTO)


(MAGISTRATE JUDGE SMYSER)


ORDER

NOW this 24th day of May, 2012, upon review of Magistrate Judge Smyser's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 32) for plain error or manifest injustice, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

(1) The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 32) is ADOPTED.
(2) This case shall be placed on the October 2012 trial list. A pretrial scheduling order will follow.

___________

A. Richard Caputo

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Mayo v. Smith

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
May 24, 2012
No. 3:11-CV-00807 (M.D. Pa. May. 24, 2012)
Case details for

Mayo v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:WARREN MAYO Plaintiff, v. CHRIS SMITH and MICHAELWELSH Defendants

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: May 24, 2012

Citations

No. 3:11-CV-00807 (M.D. Pa. May. 24, 2012)