From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mayo v. Jasmin

Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, Second Department
Jul 12, 2021
No. 2021-68841 (N.Y. App. Div. Jul. 12, 2021)

Opinion

2021-68841 Index 700705/2020

07-12-2021

Keisha Mayo, appellant, v. Edwich Jasmin, et al., respondents. Motion No. 2021-03476


Unpublished Opinion

MOTION DECISION

MARK C. DILLON, J.P. BETSY BARROS, ANGELA G. IANNACCI, JOSEPH A. ZAYAS, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION

Appeal from a purported order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated March 29, 2021. By order to show cause dated May 28, 2021, the parties were directed to show cause before this Court why the appeal should or should not be dismissed on the ground that no order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated March 29, 2021, was issued in the above-entitled action.

Now, upon the order to show cause and the papers filed in response thereto, it is

ORDERED that on the Court's own motion, the notice of appeal is deemed to reflect that appeal is from an order dated February 24, 2021 (see CPLR 2001); and it is further, ORDERED that the motion to dismiss on the ground that no order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated March 29, 2021, was issued in the above-entitled action is denied as academic; and it is further, ORDERED that on the Court's own motion, the appeal from the order dated February 24, 2021, is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, on the ground that no appeal lies from an order entered upon the default of the appealing party (see CPLR 5511).

DILLON, J.P., BARROS, IANNACCI and ZAYAS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Mayo v. Jasmin

Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, Second Department
Jul 12, 2021
No. 2021-68841 (N.Y. App. Div. Jul. 12, 2021)
Case details for

Mayo v. Jasmin

Case Details

Full title:Keisha Mayo, appellant, v. Edwich Jasmin, et al., respondents. Motion No…

Court:Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, Second Department

Date published: Jul 12, 2021

Citations

No. 2021-68841 (N.Y. App. Div. Jul. 12, 2021)