From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mayo v. Guererri

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 30, 1975
48 A.D.2d 758 (N.Y. App. Div. 1975)

Opinion

May 30, 1975

Appeal from the Ontario Trial Term.

Present — Moule, J.P., Cardamone, Simons, Goldman and Del Vecchio, JJ.


Judgment unanimously reversed, on the facts, and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event, unless respondents Guererri shall, within 10 days after entry of the order herein, stipulate to judgment in the claim of Robert G. and Nancy Mayo as parents of Martin Mayo, an infant, for the sum of $200, in which event the judgment is affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: There is a reasonable interpretation of the evidence in the record which supports the verdicts of Nancy and Robert Mayo and we are unable to say that the verdicts are inadequate (Mansfield v Graff, 47 A.D.2d 581). The proof also establishes that the infant received minor injuries although he incurred no medical expenses. He should receive damages of $200 for his pain and suffering and if defendants Guererri fail so to stipulate, the judgment is reversed as to the infant's cause of action and a new trial granted.


Summaries of

Mayo v. Guererri

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 30, 1975
48 A.D.2d 758 (N.Y. App. Div. 1975)
Case details for

Mayo v. Guererri

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT G. MAYO et al., Individually and as parents of MARTIN MAYO, an…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: May 30, 1975

Citations

48 A.D.2d 758 (N.Y. App. Div. 1975)