From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Maynard v. Schneider

United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Beaumont Division
May 10, 2023
Civil Action 1:22cv113 (E.D. Tex. May. 10, 2023)

Opinion

Civil Action 1:22cv113

05-10-2023

CODY MAYNARD v. L. SCHNEIDER


ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Michael J. Truncale, United States District Judge

Cody Maynard, proceeding pro se, filed the above-styled lawsuit. The Court previously referred this matter to the Honorable Christine L. Stetson, United States Magistrate Judge. The magistrate judge submitted a Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge recommending this case be dismissed without prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). A document sent to plaintiff was returned to the Court with a notation indicating plaintiff was no longer at the address he provided to the Court. Eastern District of Texas Local Rule CV-11(d) requires pro se litigants to provide the Court with a physical address and advise the clerk in writing of any change of address.

The Court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. A copy of the Report and Recommendation was mailed to plaintiff at the address he provided to the Court. No objections were filed to the Report and Recommendation.

ORDER

Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law contained in the Report of the magistrate judge are correct and the Report [Dkt. 8] is ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court. A final judgment shall be entered in accordance with the recommendation of the magistrate judge.


Summaries of

Maynard v. Schneider

United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Beaumont Division
May 10, 2023
Civil Action 1:22cv113 (E.D. Tex. May. 10, 2023)
Case details for

Maynard v. Schneider

Case Details

Full title:CODY MAYNARD v. L. SCHNEIDER

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Beaumont Division

Date published: May 10, 2023

Citations

Civil Action 1:22cv113 (E.D. Tex. May. 10, 2023)