From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Maynard v. George A. Fuller Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 20, 1997
236 A.D.2d 300 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

February 20, 1997.

"Order, Supreme Court, New York County (David Saxe, J.), entered on or about April 24, 1996, which, inter alia, denied the motions of defendants and third-party defendants to strike plaintiffs note of issue and certificate of readiness, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Before: Sullivan, J.P., Ellerin, Tom and Andrias, JJ.


The automatic stay provisions of the Federal bankruptcy laws apply only to the parties in the adversary proceeding in Bankruptcy Court and do not extend to nonbankrupt codefendants. As none of the parties in the instant matter is the same as the party in the adversary proceeding in Bankruptcy Court, the automatic stay provisions are inapplicable ( see, CenTrust Servs. v Guterman, 160 AD2d 416). In light of the procedural history of this case, the motion court properly exercised its discretion in setting the subject discovery schedule, while refusing to strike plaintiffs note of issue.


Summaries of

Maynard v. George A. Fuller Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 20, 1997
236 A.D.2d 300 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Maynard v. George A. Fuller Company

Case Details

Full title:HELOUISE MAYNARD, Respondent, v. GEORGE A. FULLER COMPANY, Defendant, and…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 20, 1997

Citations

236 A.D.2d 300 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
653 N.Y.S.2d 349

Citing Cases

Mak Glob. Ltd. v. Kam Yee Wong

In opposition, defendants contend, inter alia, that this matter should be stayed in light of the automatic…

United Airlines, Inc. v. Ogden New York Services, Inc.

It is unclear whether, under the stipulation, the September 10 and 11 productions were intended to be…