Summary
finding the acquiescence claim should be reviewed for correction of errors at law even though case had an equity designation and the parties asserted our review was de novo
Summary of this case from Albert v. CongerOpinion
No. 15–0142.
09-23-2015
Sabre MAYHUGH, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. Esther M. DEA, in her Capacity as Trustee of Richard W. Dea Revocable Trust, Esther M. Dea, in her capacity as Trustee of Esther M. Dea Trust, Thomas Pattee and Kathleen Pattee, husband and wife, and Esther M. Dea, in her individual Capacity, Defendants–Appellees.
Patrick B. Griffin of Kutak Rock, LLP, Omaha, Nebraska, for appellant. Robert M. Livingston and Kristopher K. Madsen of Stuart Tinley Law Firm, LLP, Council Bluffs, and Matthew J. Hudson of Hall Hudson, P.C., Harlan, for appellees.
DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
Affirmed.