From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mayfonk Athletic, LLC v. Nike, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION
Aug 20, 2015
No. 3:14-cv-00423-MO (D. Or. Aug. 20, 2015)

Opinion

No. 3:14-cv-00423-MO

08-20-2015

MAYFONK ATHLETIC, LLC, Plaintiff, v. NIKE, INC., Defendant.


OPINION AND ORDER MOSMAN, J.,

On July 7, 2015, a claim construction hearing was held in the above-entitled patent action. At issue are claim terms appearing in U.S. Patent Numbers 8,253,586 ("586 patent") and 8,860,584 ("584 patent"). Following the hearing, I instructed the parties to provide me with additional briefing concerning the proper construction of the term "personal processing unit." In this updated Opinion and Order, I announce my constructions of the following terms:

Claim Term

Construction

'586 patent

"initializing by said computing unit at least one sensordevice and the computing unit, wherein said step of

Providing for electrical power bythe computing unit to at least one

initializing comprises providing for the provision ofelectrical power"(claim 12)

sensor and the computing unit.

"integrated"(claim 12)

As agreed to by the parties

"conditioning into a distance measurement an electricalsignal corresponding to the time delay embedded in saidsensor data"(claim 12)

Plain and ordinary meaning

"tracking said distance measurement for one or morediscrete time intervals as period data"(claim 12)

Plain and ordinary meaning

'584 patent

"activity programs"/ "activity program"(claims 21 and 23)

Software loaded on thecomputing unit that controlssensor data acquisition inconnection with a particularathletic activity.

"in real time"(claims 3,4,6,9,12,13,15)

Without any delay beyond theinherent transmission,processing, or storagerequirements described in thePatent.

"real time transmission"(claims 9, 12)

Without any delay beyond theinherent transmission,processing, or storagerequirements described in thePatent.

"real time automated storage"(claim 21)

Without any delay beyond theinherent transmission,processing, or storagerequirements described in thePatent.

"specifically paired, defined by at least one of a wiredserial connection and wireless bonding which enablesthe computing unit to authenticate the identity of theexternal computing device prior to communicatingelectrical signals therewith"(claims 3 and 12)

Specifically paired, defined by atleast one of: (1) a wired serialconnection, or (2) a wirelessbonding which enables thecomputing unit to authenticatethe identity of the externalcomputing device prior tocommunicating electrical signalstherewith.

"personal processing unit"(claims 21, 23, 24 and 27)

A computing device configuredto receive and process athleticperformance parameter sensordata.

"interactive subscriber communication"(claims 3 and 12)

No construction necessary

DATED this 20th day of August, 2015.

/s/ Michael W. Mosman

MICHAEL W. MOSMAN

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Mayfonk Athletic, LLC v. Nike, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION
Aug 20, 2015
No. 3:14-cv-00423-MO (D. Or. Aug. 20, 2015)
Case details for

Mayfonk Athletic, LLC v. Nike, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:MAYFONK ATHLETIC, LLC, Plaintiff, v. NIKE, INC., Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

Date published: Aug 20, 2015

Citations

No. 3:14-cv-00423-MO (D. Or. Aug. 20, 2015)