From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mayflower Dairy Products v. Fidelity-Phenix F. Ins. Co.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Dec 20, 1938
170 Misc. 2 (N.Y. App. Term 1938)

Summary

In Mayflower Dairy Products, Inc., v. Fidelity-Phenix Fire Ins. Co. of New York, 9 N.Y.S.2d 892 (N.Y. App. 1938) (Per Curiam) the appellant's usual practice was to keep his trucks loaded at all times so as to enable them to roll early in the morning.

Summary of this case from Home Ins. Co. v. F F Clothing Co.

Opinion

December 20, 1938.

Appeal from the Municipal Court of the City of New York, Borough of Manhattan, First District.

Rein Thirkield, for the appellant.

Goldstein Goldstein, for the respondent.


Transportation or in transit as applied to a seller making its own deliveries to customers means the movement of the loaded conveyance carrying the goods from the starting point or seller's premises to the point of destination or place of delivery to the buyer or customer. While there may be some reasonable deviation, such as temporary stops, incidental to the process of delivery or necessary for those engaged in same, or even the return of undelivered goods, transportation or in transit implies the continuous action of moving the goods from the one point and putting them down in another. In our opinion in transit cannot include a period commencing on the evening of one day when for its own convenience the seller in its own premises loads the goods on its truck, and extending then on through the night during which the loaded truck is stored in such premises on to that time in the morning of the next day when the truck is manned and proceeds on its way to the point of destination. Such a situation implies storage.

Judgment reversed, with thirty dollars costs, and judgment directed for defendant, with costs.

All concur. Present — LYDON, HAMMER and SHIENTAG, JJ.


Summaries of

Mayflower Dairy Products v. Fidelity-Phenix F. Ins. Co.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Dec 20, 1938
170 Misc. 2 (N.Y. App. Term 1938)

In Mayflower Dairy Products, Inc., v. Fidelity-Phenix Fire Ins. Co. of New York, 9 N.Y.S.2d 892 (N.Y. App. 1938) (Per Curiam) the appellant's usual practice was to keep his trucks loaded at all times so as to enable them to roll early in the morning.

Summary of this case from Home Ins. Co. v. F F Clothing Co.

In Mayflower, the goods were loaded one day to be transited next day and the court held "such a situation implies storage" (Mayflower, 170 Misc. 2, 3).

Summary of this case from Alpha & Omega Manhattan Corp. v. Lonmar Glob. Risks Ltd. trading as Lonmart

In Mayflower the court found that there was no coverage when goods were stolen from a truck which was loaded one day, with transit to begin on the following day.

Summary of this case from Irv-Bob v. Pub. Serv. Ins. Co.
Case details for

Mayflower Dairy Products v. Fidelity-Phenix F. Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:MAYFLOWER DAIRY PRODUCTS, INC., Respondent, v. FIDELITY-PHENIX FIRE…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: Dec 20, 1938

Citations

170 Misc. 2 (N.Y. App. Term 1938)
9 N.Y.S.2d 892

Citing Cases

Irv-Bob v. Pub. Serv. Ins. Co.

In support of its claim that the tuxedos were not "in transit" at the time of the loss, defendant relies on…

Home Ins. Co. v. F F Clothing Co.

The majority of opinions discussing this point of law issue forth from the lower courts of record in New York…