From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mayfield v. Hornsby

Supreme Court of Georgia
Mar 7, 1945
33 S.E.2d 312 (Ga. 1945)

Opinion

15063.

FEBRUARY 7, 1945. REHEARING DENIED MARCH 7, 1945.

Habeas corpus. Before Judge Moore. Fulton superior court. October 17, 1945.

Grover C. Powell, John W. Bolton, Frank T. Grizzard, James R. Venable, and Frank A. Bowers, for plaintiff in error.

John A. Boykin, E. E. Andrews, solicitors-general, C. E. Presley, and Durwood T. Pye, contra.


1. Under repeated rulings of this court, the guilt or innocence of one charged with a crime in the demanding State is not a matter for determination by the Governor before issuing his extradition warrant, or by the courts upon the hearing of habeas-corpus proceedings seeking release from custody of an arresting officer of one held under the Governor's extradition warrant. That warrant being regular upon its face, the law presumes that it issued regularly. The officer executing such warrant is performing his duty, and his custody thereunder is a legal detention. Hart v. Mount, 196 Ga. 452 ( 26 S.E.2d 453); King v. Mount, 196 Ga. 461 ( 26 S.E.2d 419); Broyles v. Mount, 197 Ga. 659 ( 30 S.E.2d 48).

2. It follows that the court did not err in the present habeas-corpus case in remanding the prisoner to the custody of the officer, who the record shows was holding her under a warrant of the Governor, regular upon its face, extraditing her to the State of Ohio, whose requisition shows that she is accused of a crime in that State, an affidavit before a magistrate to this effect being in the record.

Judgment affirmed. All the Justices concur, except Wyatt, J., absent because of illness.

No. 15063. FEBRUARY 7, 1945. REHEARING DENIED MARCH 7, 1945.


Summaries of

Mayfield v. Hornsby

Supreme Court of Georgia
Mar 7, 1945
33 S.E.2d 312 (Ga. 1945)
Case details for

Mayfield v. Hornsby

Case Details

Full title:MAYFIELD v. HORNSBY

Court:Supreme Court of Georgia

Date published: Mar 7, 1945

Citations

33 S.E.2d 312 (Ga. 1945)
33 S.E.2d 312

Citing Cases

Williams v. Grimes

Where it is shown in a habeas corpus case that the respondent holds the petitioner in custody under an…

McFarlin v. Shirley

The trial court, therefore, erred in remanding the petitioner to the respondent. See, in this connection,…