From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mayfield v. At&T

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION
Aug 29, 2017
Case No: 4:17CV1418 HEA (E.D. Mo. Aug. 29, 2017)

Opinion

Case No: 4:17CV1418 HEA

08-29-2017

MICHELE MAYFIELD, Plaintiff, v. AT&T, et al., Defendants.


OPINION , MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

This matter is before the Court on it's own motion. Plaintiff filed complaint on May 1, 2017. Plaintiff was granted leave to proceed informa pauperis on May 2, 2017 [Doc. No. 5]. Thereafter, on June 23, 2017, Defendant AT&T filed A Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 16]. Plaintiff , proceeding pro se, filed a request for additional time in which to respond which was granted by the court on July 10, 2017. In excess of forty (40) days have expired since the grant of additional time and Plaintiff has failed to file a response or opposition to the Motion to Dismiss.

Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff is to Show Cause to the Court, within 14 days of the date of this order, why the Motion to Dismiss[Doc. No. 16] should not be granted.

Dated this 29th day of August, 2017.

/s/_________

HENRY EDWARD AUTREY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Mayfield v. At&T

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION
Aug 29, 2017
Case No: 4:17CV1418 HEA (E.D. Mo. Aug. 29, 2017)
Case details for

Mayfield v. At&T

Case Details

Full title:MICHELE MAYFIELD, Plaintiff, v. AT&T, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Aug 29, 2017

Citations

Case No: 4:17CV1418 HEA (E.D. Mo. Aug. 29, 2017)