Summary
In Mayer v. Raudenbush (217 N.Y. 633) a Pennsylvania judgment entered upon confession by power of attorney was recognized as valid in New York, the court affirming the Appellate Division (154 A.D. 937) in a memorandum decision based upon a citation of Teel v. Yost (supra) as authority. The record on appeal in that case does not reveal whether the defendant was a resident of Pennsylvania or of New York, the question of residence at the time of judgment not being mentioned either in the pleadings or in the evidence.
Summary of this case from Baldwin Building Loan Association v. KleinOpinion
Submitted January 14, 1916
Decided February 1, 1916
Theodore F. Kuper for appellant.
David J. Gallert and Walter S. Heilborn for respondents.
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: WILLARD BARTLETT, Ch. J., CHASE, COLLIN, CUDDEBACK, CARDOZO, SEABURY and POUND, JJ.