From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mayen v. W.M. Bolthouse Farms, Inc.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Oct 17, 2022
1:21-cv-00318-ADA-CDB (E.D. Cal. Oct. 17, 2022)

Opinion

1:21-cv-00318-ADA-CDB

10-17-2022

JULIO MAYEN, an individual on his own behalf and on behalf of others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. W.M. BOLTHOUSE FARMS, INC. et al., Defendants.


ORDER RE: STIPULATION (1) EXTENDING DEADLINE NUNC PRO TUNC FOR DEFENDANT W.M. BOLTHOUSE FARMS, INC. TO RESPOND TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT; (2) REGARDING THE BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON DEFENDANT BOLTHOUSE'S FORTHCOMING MOTION TO DISMISS THE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT; AND (3) REGARDING A SCHEDULING CONFERENCE (ECF No. 23)

On August 18, 2022, this Court issued an Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendant W.M. Bolthouse's Motion to Dismiss and granted Plaintiff leave to file a second Emended complaint. (ECF No. 18). On September 7, 2022, Plaintiff filed a Second Amended 'omplaint. (ECF No. 20).

On October 5, 2022, the parties filed a stipulation requesting: (1) an extension of the leadline for Defendant W.M. Bolthouse Farms Inc. to Respond to Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint; (2) additional time for Plaintiff to file an opposition and Defendant W.M. Bolthouse Farms Inc. to file a reply; (3) a motions hearing date; and (4) an extension of the parties' deadline to contact the courtroom deputy to secure a scheduling conference date following the Court' nsesolution of Defendant W.M. Bolthouse Farms Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss. (ECF No. 23). Based on the parties' representations in the stipulation, the Court finds good cause exists to grant the parties' stipulated requests.

Accordingly, pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

1. Defendant W.M. Bolthouse Farms Inc.'s deadline to respond to Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint shall be extended nunc pro tunc to October 19, 2022;
2. Plaintiff shall receive seven additional days beyond those provided for in the applicable rules to respond to Defendant W.M. Bolthouse Farms Inc.'s motion to dismiss Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint, Defendant W.M. Bolthouse Farms Inc. shall file its reply no later than ten days after Plaintiff files his opposition, and the hearing on the motion shall take place on a date no less than eleven days after Defendant W.M. Bolthouse Farms Inc. files its reply; and
3. A scheduling conference is set for April 10, 2023, at 9:00am in Bakersfield, 510 19th Street before Magistrate Judge Christopher D. Baker.

It IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Mayen v. W.M. Bolthouse Farms, Inc.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Oct 17, 2022
1:21-cv-00318-ADA-CDB (E.D. Cal. Oct. 17, 2022)
Case details for

Mayen v. W.M. Bolthouse Farms, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:JULIO MAYEN, an individual on his own behalf and on behalf of others…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Oct 17, 2022

Citations

1:21-cv-00318-ADA-CDB (E.D. Cal. Oct. 17, 2022)