From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mayberry v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District
May 20, 2003
104 S.W.3d 804 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003)

Opinion

No. WD 61274

May 20, 2003

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Jackson County; Peggy Stevens McGraw, Judge.

Susan L. Hogan, Assistant Appellate Defender, Kansas City, MO, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Charnette D. Douglass, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Before Howard, P.J., and Lowenstein and Hardwick, JJ.


Order


Fentress D. Mayberry appeals the motion court's denial of his Rule 24.035 motion without a hearing. Mayberry contends the motion court erred in denying his Rule 24.035 motion as untimely filed because he pleaded factual allegations that demonstrate that he made a good faith effort to file a timely motion and that the late filing of his motion was due to the circuit court's failure to file-stamp the motion in a timely manner. Mayberry further contends the motion court erred in denying his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing because he alleged that plea counsel failed to act as a reasonably competent attorney by misleading him to believe that Mayberry's mother thought he should plead guilty, and therefore his guilty plea was not entered knowingly and voluntarily.

Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Mayberry v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District
May 20, 2003
104 S.W.3d 804 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003)
Case details for

Mayberry v. State

Case Details

Full title:FENTRESS MAYBERRY, Appellant, v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District

Date published: May 20, 2003

Citations

104 S.W.3d 804 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003)