From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mayberry v. General Orthopedics

Supreme Court of Michigan
Dec 3, 2004
471 Mich. 931 (Mich. 2004)

Opinion

No. 126136.

December 3, 2004.


SC: 126136, COA: 244162.

Orders Granting Oral Argument in Cases Pending on Application for Leave to Appeal.

Pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), the clerk is to schedule oral argument on whether to grant the application or take other peremptory action permitted by MCR 7.302(G)(1). The parties shall file supplemental briefs within 28 days of the date of this order, which shall include among the issues discussed: (1) whether a notice of intent filed when more than 182 days remain in the limitations period has the effect of tolling the period by operation of MCL 600.5856(d), (2) whether the prohibition against tacking successive 182-day periods set forth in MCL 600.2912b(6) applies to a subsequent notice of intent filed after a prior notice period has expired and when fewer than 182 days remain in the limitations period, and (3) whether, under MCL 600.5856(d), the filing of a notice of intent filed when fewer than 182 days remain in the limitations period has the effect of tolling the period if a prior notice of intent did not trigger a tolling.


Summaries of

Mayberry v. General Orthopedics

Supreme Court of Michigan
Dec 3, 2004
471 Mich. 931 (Mich. 2004)
Case details for

Mayberry v. General Orthopedics

Case Details

Full title:MAYBERRY v. GENERAL ORTHOPEDICS, PC

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan

Date published: Dec 3, 2004

Citations

471 Mich. 931 (Mich. 2004)
689 N.W.2d 232