From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

May v. American Red Cross

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 30, 2001
287 A.D.2d 418 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

October 30, 2001.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Howard Silver, J.), entered April 11, 2001, which denied defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Suzanne B. Holzberg, for plaintiff-respondent.

Patricia D'Alvia, for defendant-appellant.

Before: Nardelli, J.P., Andrias, Lerner, Saxe, Marlow, JJ.


Summary judgment was properly denied since triable issues of fact as to whether defendant had constructive notice of the complained of ice hazard, are raised by plaintiff's affidavit, wherein she states that her injurious fall was caused by a pre-existing and unremedied icy condition that had developed from a snowfall 12 days earlier, and by meteorlogical records supportive of plaintiff's account of the alleged hazard's origin and duration (see, Ralat v. New York City Hous. Auth., 265 A.D.2d 185).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

May v. American Red Cross

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 30, 2001
287 A.D.2d 418 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

May v. American Red Cross

Case Details

Full title:GENEVA MAY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. AMERICAN RED CROSS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 30, 2001

Citations

287 A.D.2d 418 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
731 N.Y.S.2d 733

Citing Cases

Torella v. Benderson Development Co., Inc.

urt properly denied the motion of defendant Benderson Development Company, Inc. and the remaining Benderson…

Fernandez v. 1330 3rd Ave. Corp.

"Constructive notice requires that the defect be visible and apparent, and it must exist for a sufficient…