From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Maxwell v. Walker

United States District Court, E.D. California
Nov 23, 2009
No. CIV S-09-3183 KJM P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 23, 2009)

Opinion

No. CIV S-09-3183 KJM P.

November 23, 2009


ORDER


Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. In his application, petitioner challenges the execution of his sentence. He is confined in San Diego County which lies within the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the Southern District of California. When a prisoner challenges the execution of his sentence, the preferable venue is the court with jurisdiction over the place where the prisoner is confined.See Dunne v. Henman, 875 F.2d 244, 249 (9th Cir. 1989).

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this matter is transferred to the United States District Court for the Southern District of California. Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court, 410 U.S. 484, 499 n. 15 (1973); 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d).


Summaries of

Maxwell v. Walker

United States District Court, E.D. California
Nov 23, 2009
No. CIV S-09-3183 KJM P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 23, 2009)
Case details for

Maxwell v. Walker

Case Details

Full title:CLIFTON MAXWELL, Petitioner, v. JAMES WALKER, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Nov 23, 2009

Citations

No. CIV S-09-3183 KJM P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 23, 2009)