From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Maxwell v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Sep 1, 2006
937 So. 2d 216 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

Summary

affirming summary denial of motion for post-conviction relief, where the defendant's claims were legally insufficient and conclusively refuted by the record

Summary of this case from Nembhard v. State

Opinion

No. 3D05-2284.

September 1, 2006.

An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, David C. Miller, Judge.

Rudolph Maxwell, in proper person.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, and Robin F. Hazel, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before GERSTEN, GREEN, and SUAREZ, JJ.


The defendant appeals the trial court's summary denial of his motion for post conviction relief alleging ineffective assistance of trial counsel. The defendant's claims are legally insufficient and conclusively refuted by the record. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850; Fla.R.App.P. 9.141(b)(2)(D), Walls v. State, 926 So.2d 1156 (Fla. 2006).

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Maxwell v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Sep 1, 2006
937 So. 2d 216 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

affirming summary denial of motion for post-conviction relief, where the defendant's claims were legally insufficient and conclusively refuted by the record

Summary of this case from Nembhard v. State
Case details for

Maxwell v. State

Case Details

Full title:Rudolph MAXWELL, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Sep 1, 2006

Citations

937 So. 2d 216 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

Citing Cases

Wilbon v. State

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850; Maxwell v. State, 937 So.2d 216 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006).…

Nembhard v. State

Affirmed. See Maxwell v. State, 937 So. 2d 216 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006) (affirming summary denial of motion for…