From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Maxwell v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Eleventh District, Eastland
Aug 18, 2005
No. 11-03-00226-CR (Tex. App. Aug. 18, 2005)

Opinion

No. 11-03-00226-CR

August 18, 2005. DO NOT PUBLISH. Tex.R.App.P. 47.2(b).

Appeal from Dawson County. On Motion for Rehearing.

Panel consists of: WRIGHT, J., and McCALL, J.


OPINION


In his motion for rehearing, Willie Lee Maxwell argues that this court failed to address the underlying merits of his Batson claim. Appellant has not properly presented the underlying merits of his Batson claim to this court for review. Appellant's sole point of error was a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. See TEX.R.APP.P. 38.1(h). In this case, the underlying merits of appellant's Batson claim are not subsidiary questions of his sole issue of counsel's effectiveness and are not properly before this court. See TEX.R.APP.P. 38.1(e). The motion for rehearing is denied.

Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 (1986).


Summaries of

Maxwell v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Eleventh District, Eastland
Aug 18, 2005
No. 11-03-00226-CR (Tex. App. Aug. 18, 2005)
Case details for

Maxwell v. State

Case Details

Full title:WILLIE LEE MAXWELL, Appellant v. STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Eleventh District, Eastland

Date published: Aug 18, 2005

Citations

No. 11-03-00226-CR (Tex. App. Aug. 18, 2005)