From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Maxwell v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas
Feb 6, 2003
97 S.W.3d 418 (Ark. 2003)

Opinion

CR 03-55

Opinion delivered February 6, 2003

APPEAL ERROR — MOTION FOR RULE ON CLERK — GOOD CAUSE FOR GRANTING. — An admission by an attorney for a criminal defendant that a motion to extend the time to file the record was not filed in timely fashion due to a mistake on his part is good cause to grant a motion for rule on the clerk.

Motion for Rule on Clerk; granted.

David L. Chambers, for appellant.

No response.


Appellant Richard Harold Maxwell, by and through his attorney, David L. Chambers, has filed a motion for rule on clerk. Mr. Chambers, states in the motion that his motion to extend the time to file the record was not filed in timely fashion due to a mistake on his part.

[1] We find that such an error, admittedly made by an attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See In Re Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).

The motion is, therefore, granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.


Summaries of

Maxwell v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas
Feb 6, 2003
97 S.W.3d 418 (Ark. 2003)
Case details for

Maxwell v. State

Case Details

Full title:Richard Harold MAXWELL v. STATE of Arkansas

Court:Supreme Court of Arkansas

Date published: Feb 6, 2003

Citations

97 S.W.3d 418 (Ark. 2003)
97 S.W.3d 418