From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Maxwell v. Mitchell

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 1, 2021
2:15-CV-0015-JAM-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 1, 2021)

Opinion

2:15-CV-0015-JAM-DMC-P

09-01-2021

ANTHONY PAUL MAXWELL, Plaintiff, v. RYON MITCHELL, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

JOHN A. MENDEZ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, brought this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Final judgment was entered on April 27, 2021, and this action is closed. Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's motion, ECF No. 74, for relief from judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(1).

The Court may grant reconsideration under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 59(e) and 60. Under Rule 60(b), the Court may grant reconsideration of a final judgment and any order based on: (1) mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect; (2) newly discovered evidence which, with reasonable diligence, could not have been discovered within ten days of entry of judgment; and (3) fraud, misrepresentation, or misconduct of an opposing party. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b)(1)-(3). A motion for reconsideration on any of these grounds must be brought within one year of entry of judgment or the order being challenged. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(c)(1).

Plaintiff argues relief is warranted due to excusable neglect. See ECF No. 74, pg. 1. According to Plaintiff, he never received the Court's March 22, 2021, findings and recommendations, which were adopted in full on April 27, 2021. See id. at 2. Plaintiff states: “Mail delivery to Plaintiff's address has been compromised, either through theft or slow delivery.” Id. The Court finds Plaintiff has established excusable neglect and will provide Plaintiff an opportunity to file objections.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's motion, ECF No. 74, for relief from judgment is granted;

2. The Court's order, ECF No. 72, adopting the March 22, 2021, findings and recommendations and the final judgment, ECF No. 73, issued on April 27, 2021, are vacated;

3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to re-open this action;

4. The Clerk of the Court is further directed to re-serve a copy of the Court's March 22, 2021, findings and recommendations on Plaintiff with a copy of this order; and

5. Plaintiff may file objections to the findings and recommendations within 20 days of the date of this order.


Summaries of

Maxwell v. Mitchell

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 1, 2021
2:15-CV-0015-JAM-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 1, 2021)
Case details for

Maxwell v. Mitchell

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY PAUL MAXWELL, Plaintiff, v. RYON MITCHELL, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Sep 1, 2021

Citations

2:15-CV-0015-JAM-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 1, 2021)