From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Maxwell v. Lesnick

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION
Jul 28, 2016
CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-CV-00300 (W.D. La. Jul. 28, 2016)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-CV-00300

07-28-2016

BRITTANY MAXWELL, Plaintiff v. BRENT LESNICK, ET AL., Defendants


MAGISTRATE JUDGE PEREZ-MONTES

JUDGMENT

For the reasons contained in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein, noting the absence of objections thereto, and concurring with the Magistrate Judge's findings under the applicable law;

IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Remand (Doc. 5) is DENIED.

THUS ORDERED AND SIGNED in Chambers at Alexandria, Louisiana, on this 28th day of July, 2016.

/s/_________

DEE D. DRELL, CHIEF JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

Maxwell v. Lesnick

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION
Jul 28, 2016
CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-CV-00300 (W.D. La. Jul. 28, 2016)
Case details for

Maxwell v. Lesnick

Case Details

Full title:BRITTANY MAXWELL, Plaintiff v. BRENT LESNICK, ET AL., Defendants

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION

Date published: Jul 28, 2016

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-CV-00300 (W.D. La. Jul. 28, 2016)