From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Maxwell v. Cincinnati Met. Hsg. Auth.

Court of Appeals of Ohio, First District, Hamilton County
Mar 29, 2000
Appeal No. C-990621, Trial Court No. A-9505497 (Ohio Ct. App. Mar. 29, 2000)

Opinion

Appeal No. C-990621, Trial Court No. A-9505497.

Date of Announcement of Decision March 29, 2000.


JUDGMENT ENTRY.


This appeal, considered on the accelerated calendar under App.R. 11.1(E) and Loc.R. 12, is not controlling authority except as provided in S.Ct.R.Rep.Op. 2(G)(1).

Defendant-appellant Cincinnati Metropolitan Housing Authority appeals from the order of the trial court denying its motion for summary judgment. Relying on R.C. 2744.02(C), the trial court found its order to be subject to interlocutory appeal.

R.C. 2744.02(C) was enacted by Am.Sub.H.B. No. 350, which was declared unconstitutional in State ex rel. Ohio Academy of Trial Lawyers v. Sheward (1999), 86 Ohio St.3d 451, 715 N.E.2d 1062. Therefore, we dismiss this appeal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction because the trial court's order was not a final appealable order. See Hubbard v. Canton City School Bd. of Education (2000), 88 Ohio St.3d 14, 722 N.E.2d 1025.

Therefore, this appeal is dismissed.

Further, a certified copy of this Judgment Entry shall constitute the mandate, which shall be sent to the trial court under App.R. 27. Costs shall be taxed under App.R. 24.

GORMAN and WINKLER, JJ.

HILDEBRANDT, Presiding Judge.


Summaries of

Maxwell v. Cincinnati Met. Hsg. Auth.

Court of Appeals of Ohio, First District, Hamilton County
Mar 29, 2000
Appeal No. C-990621, Trial Court No. A-9505497 (Ohio Ct. App. Mar. 29, 2000)
Case details for

Maxwell v. Cincinnati Met. Hsg. Auth.

Case Details

Full title:VIVIAN LEE MAXWELL, ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF JUAN MAXWELL…

Court:Court of Appeals of Ohio, First District, Hamilton County

Date published: Mar 29, 2000

Citations

Appeal No. C-990621, Trial Court No. A-9505497 (Ohio Ct. App. Mar. 29, 2000)