From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

MAXWELL v. CALDWELL, ADM'R

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jan 1, 1875
72 N.C. 450 (N.C. 1875)

Opinion

January Term, 1875.

When a Judge below refuses to give a judgment prayed for, (except in the case of his refusal to grant an Injunction,) no appeal lies to this Court.

CIVIL ACTION, to recover the amount of certain notes, and that certain land shall be charged with the payment of the same, heard before Schenck, J., at the Fall Term, 1874, of CABARRUS Superior Court.

No statement of facts is necessary in this case.

From the refusal of his Honor to give judgment on the pleadings, the plaintiff appealed.

Barringer, for appellant.

Montgomery and Walker, contra.


No appeal will lie from a mere refusal of the Judge to give a judgment prayed for, (except in the case of his refusal to grant an injunction.)

The Judge here gives no judgment. Let this opinion be certified.

PER CURIAM. Case remanded to be proceeded in according to law.


Summaries of

MAXWELL v. CALDWELL, ADM'R

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jan 1, 1875
72 N.C. 450 (N.C. 1875)
Case details for

MAXWELL v. CALDWELL, ADM'R

Case Details

Full title:D.C. MAXWELL v . H. M. CALDWELL, Adm'r and others

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Jan 1, 1875

Citations

72 N.C. 450 (N.C. 1875)

Citing Cases

Capel v. Peebles

In such case the refusal of the court below to dismiss the proceedings and order a cancellation of the bond…

Hatfield v. Hatfield

In 2 Cyc. p. 539, we find the rule stated that the mere refusal of a judge or court to take any action is not…