From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Maxum Indem. Co. v. Sullivan Vineyards Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 29, 2016
Case No. 16-cv-03611-HSG (N.D. Cal. Nov. 29, 2016)

Opinion

Case No. 16-cv-03611-HSG

11-29-2016

MAXUM INDEMNITY COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. SULLIVAN VINEYARDS CORPORATION, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION REGARDING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT

Re: Dkt. No. 31

The Court has reviewed Magistrate Judge Spero's Report and Recommendation Re Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment. The time for objections has passed and none were filed. The Court finds the Report correct, well-reasoned and thorough, and adopts it in every respect. Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment is GRANTED. The Clerk shall enter judgment in accordance with the Report and Recommendation and close the file.

IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: November 29, 2016

/s/_________

HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Maxum Indem. Co. v. Sullivan Vineyards Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 29, 2016
Case No. 16-cv-03611-HSG (N.D. Cal. Nov. 29, 2016)
Case details for

Maxum Indem. Co. v. Sullivan Vineyards Corp.

Case Details

Full title:MAXUM INDEMNITY COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. SULLIVAN VINEYARDS CORPORATION, et…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Nov 29, 2016

Citations

Case No. 16-cv-03611-HSG (N.D. Cal. Nov. 29, 2016)