Maximo v. Keffer

Full title: MARIA MAXIMO, Petitioner, v. JOE KEFFER, Warden, FMC-CARSWELL, Respondent.

Court: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION

Date published: Oct 11, 2011

CIVIL ACTION NO.4:11-CV-300-Y (N.D. Tex. Oct. 11, 2011)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO.4:11-CV-300-Y

10-11-2011

MARIA MAXIMO, Petitioner, v. JOE KEFFER, Warden, FMC-CARSWELL, Respondent.

TERRY R. MEANS

ORDER ADOPTING

MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS

In this action brought by petitioner Maria Maximo under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, the Court has made an independent review of the following matters in the above-styled and numbered cause:

1. The pleadings and record;
2. The proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the United States magistrate judge filed on September 12,
2011; and
3. The petitioner's written objections to the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the United States magistrate judge filed on October 3, 2011.

The Court, after de novo review, concludes that the Petitioner's objections must be overruled, and the petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 should be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction, for the reasons stated in the magistrate judge's findings and conclusions.

Therefore, the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the magistrate judge are ADOPTED.

Maria Maximo's petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.

TERRY R. MEANS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE