From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Maxie v. Rehak

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION
Dec 18, 2017
CAUSE NO. 3:17-CV-935 JD (N.D. Ind. Dec. 18, 2017)

Opinion

CAUSE NO. 3:17-CV-935 JD

12-18-2017

MICHAEL A. MAXIE, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL REHAK, Defendant.


OPINION AND ORDER

Michael A. Maxie, a prisoner without an attorney, filed a complaint with a motion asking to proceed in forma pauperis. However, Maxie is barred from proceeding in forma pauperis by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). This is commonly known as the "Three Strikes Rule" and Maxie has accumulated four strikes:

(1) Maxie v. Schneieer, 3:13-CV-848 (N.D. Ind. filed August 19, 2013). Case dismissed on September 4, 2013, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A as malicious;

(2) Maxie v. Doe, 3:13-CV-1278 (N.D. Ind. filed November 29, 2013). Case dismissed on February 26, 2014, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A for failure to state a claim ;

(3) Maxie v. Levenhagen, 3:13-CV-1279 (N.D. Ind. filed November 29, 2013). Case dismissed on May 1, 2014, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A for failure to state a claim;

(4) Maxie v. Wilson, 3:13-CV-1021 (N.D. Ind. filed September 23, 2013). Case dismissed on May 2, 2014, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A for failure to state a claim.

An inmate with three or more strikes "can use the partial prepayment option in § 1915(b) only if in the future he 'is under imminent danger of serious physical injury.'" Abdul-Wadood v. Nathan, 91 F.3d 1023, 1025 (7th Cir. 1996). In order to meet the imminent danger standard, the threat complained of must be real and proximate. Ciarpaglini v. Saini, 352 F.3d 328, 330 (7th Cir. 2003). Only "genuine emergencies" qualify as a basis for circumventing § 1915(g). Lewis v. Sullivan, 279 F.3d 526, 531 (7th Cir. 2002). In this case, Maxie is suing his public defender for $800,000.00 for not properly representing him in his current State court criminal proceedings. There are no allegations of imminent danger of serious physical injury. Thus, he may not proceed in forma pauperis and must pay the $400 filing fee to continue with this case.

For these reasons, Michael A. Maxie is GRANTED until January 11 , 2018 , to pay the $400 filing fee; and CAUTIONED if the fee is not paid by that date, this case will be dismissed without further notice.

SO ORDERED.

ENTERED: December 18, 2017

/s/ JON E. DEGUILIO

Judge

United States District Court


Summaries of

Maxie v. Rehak

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION
Dec 18, 2017
CAUSE NO. 3:17-CV-935 JD (N.D. Ind. Dec. 18, 2017)
Case details for

Maxie v. Rehak

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL A. MAXIE, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL REHAK, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION

Date published: Dec 18, 2017

Citations

CAUSE NO. 3:17-CV-935 JD (N.D. Ind. Dec. 18, 2017)