From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Maxie v. Lawson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION
Dec 18, 2017
CAUSE NO. 3:17-CV-936-PPS-MGG (N.D. Ind. Dec. 18, 2017)

Opinion

CAUSE NO. 3:17-CV-936-PPS-MGG

12-18-2017

MICHAEL A. MAXIE, Plaintiff, v. JULIE LAWSON, et al., Defendants.


OPINION AND ORDER

Michael A. Maxie, a prisoner without an attorney, filed a complaint and a motion asking to proceed in forma pauperis. However, Maxie is barred from proceeding in forma pauperis by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). This is commonly known as the "Three Strikes Rule" and Maxie has accumulated four strikes:

(1) Maxie v. Schneieer, 3:13-CV-848 (N.D. Ind. filed August 19, 2013). Case dismissed on September 4, 2013, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A as malicious;

(2) Maxie v. Doe, 3:13-CV-1278 (N.D. Ind. filed November 29, 2013). Case dismissed on February 26, 2014, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A for failure to state a claim;

(3) Maxie v. Levenhagen, 3:13-CV-1279 (N.D. Ind. filed November 29, 2013). Case dismissed on May 1, 2014, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A for failure to state a claim;

(4) Maxie v. Wilson, 3:13-CV-1021 (N.D. Ind. filed September 23, 2013). Case dismissed on May 2, 2014, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A for failure to state a claim.

An inmate with three or more strikes "can use the partial prepayment option in § 1915(b) only if in the future he 'is under imminent danger of serious physical injury.'" Abdul-Wadood v. Nathan, 91 F.3d 1023, 1025 (7th Cir. 1996). In order to meet the imminent danger standard, the threat complained of must be real and proximate. Ciarpaglini v. Saini, 352 F.3d 328, 330 (7th Cir. 2003). Only "genuine emergencies" qualify as a basis for circumventing § 1915(g). Lewis v. Sullivan, 279 F.3d 526, 531 (7th Cir. 2002).

In this case, Maxie is suing the defendants for monetary damages. He alleges he was not arraigned promptly after being arrested without a warrant. He also alleges he is placed on lock-down every other Wednesday while jail staff are in training which denies him access to church services, the law library, recreation, and telephone calls one day every other week. This complaint contains are no allegations of imminent danger of serious physical injury. Thus, he may not proceed in forma pauperis and must pay the $400 filing fee to continue with this case.

ACCORDINGLY,

Michael A. Maxie is GRANTED until January 11 , 2018 , to pay the $400 filing fee; and CAUTIONED if the fee is not paid by that date, this case will be dismissed without further notice.

SO ORDERED.

ENTERED: December 18, 2017

/s Philip P. Simon

Judge

United States District Court


Summaries of

Maxie v. Lawson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION
Dec 18, 2017
CAUSE NO. 3:17-CV-936-PPS-MGG (N.D. Ind. Dec. 18, 2017)
Case details for

Maxie v. Lawson

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL A. MAXIE, Plaintiff, v. JULIE LAWSON, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION

Date published: Dec 18, 2017

Citations

CAUSE NO. 3:17-CV-936-PPS-MGG (N.D. Ind. Dec. 18, 2017)