From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Max Sound Corp. v. Google, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jan 18, 2017
2016-1620 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 18, 2017)

Opinion

2016-1620

01-18-2017

MAX SOUND CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant v. GOOGLE, INC., YOUTUBE, LLC, ON2 TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Defendants-Appellees VEDANTI SYSTEMS LIMITED, Defendant

ERIC WILLIAM BUETHER, Buether Joe & Carpenter LLC, Dallas, TX, argued for plaintiff-appellant. STEFANI E. SHANBERG, Wilson, Sonsini, Goodrich & Rosati, PC, San Francisco, CA, argued for defendants-appellees. Also represented by ROBIN L. BREWER, MICHAEL J. GUO, JENNIFER J. SCHMIDT; HEIDI LYN KEEFE, Cooley LLP, Palo Alto, CA.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in No. 5:14-cv-04412-EJD, Judge Edward J. Davila.

JUDGMENT

ERIC WILLIAM BUETHER, Buether Joe & Carpenter LLC, Dallas, TX, argued for plaintiff-appellant. STEFANI E. SHANBERG, Wilson, Sonsini, Goodrich & Rosati, PC, San Francisco, CA, argued for defendants-appellees. Also represented by ROBIN L. BREWER, MICHAEL J. GUO, JENNIFER J. SCHMIDT; HEIDI LYN KEEFE, Cooley LLP, Palo Alto, CA. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, SCHALL and CHEN, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT January 18, 2017

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court


Summaries of

Max Sound Corp. v. Google, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jan 18, 2017
2016-1620 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 18, 2017)
Case details for

Max Sound Corp. v. Google, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:MAX SOUND CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant v. GOOGLE, INC., YOUTUBE, LLC…

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Jan 18, 2017

Citations

2016-1620 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 18, 2017)