From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mawhinney v. Bliss

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 23, 1909
88 N.E. 1125 (N.Y. 1909)

Opinion

Argued February 8, 1909

Decided February 23, 1909

Joseph M. Hartfield for appellants.

James A. Allen and Roger Foster for respondent.


Order affirmed, with costs; question certified answered in the affirmative; no opinion.

Concur: CULLEN, Ch. J., HAIGHT, VANN, WERNER, WILLARD BARTLETT, HISCOCK and CHASE, JJ.


Summaries of

Mawhinney v. Bliss

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 23, 1909
88 N.E. 1125 (N.Y. 1909)
Case details for

Mawhinney v. Bliss

Case Details

Full title:HUGH H. MAWHINNEY, Suing on Behalf of Himself and Others, Respondent, v …

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Feb 23, 1909

Citations

88 N.E. 1125 (N.Y. 1909)
194 N.Y. 590