From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mautz v. Consolidated Rendering Company

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 12, 1918
119 N.E. 1053 (N.Y. 1918)

Opinion

Argued January 29, 1918

Decided February 12, 1918

William H. Harding for Consolidated Rendering Company, appellant.

James F. Ray for Village of East Syracuse, appellant.

Leonard T. Haight for T.N. Benedict Manufacturing Company, appellant.

George F. Park for respondent.


Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: HISCOCK, Ch. J., CHASE, COLLIN, CUDDEBACK, HOGAN, McLAUGHLIN and CRANE, JJ.


Summaries of

Mautz v. Consolidated Rendering Company

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 12, 1918
119 N.E. 1053 (N.Y. 1918)
Case details for

Mautz v. Consolidated Rendering Company

Case Details

Full title:GILBERT MAUTZ, Respondent, v . CONSOLIDATED RENDERING COMPANY et al.…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Feb 12, 1918

Citations

119 N.E. 1053 (N.Y. 1918)
119 N.E. 1053