From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Maury v. Ventura in Manhattan, Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jul 11, 2022
18-CV-7496 (RWL) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 11, 2022)

Opinion

18-CV-7496 (RWL)

07-11-2022

JULIE MAURY, Plaintiff, v. VENTURA IN MANHATTAN, INC., et al Defendants.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

ROBERT W. LEHRBURGER, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The Court having been advised by the parties that all claims asserted in this action have been settled (Dkt. 117), it is ordered that the above-entitled action be, and hereby is, dismissed without costs; provided, however, that if the settlement is not consummated within thirty days of this Order, either party may apply by letter within that period to restore the action to the calendar. Any application to reopen must be filed within thirty days of this Order, and any application to reopen filed thereafter may be denied solely on that basis. If the parties wish for the Court to retain jurisdiction to enforce a settlement agreement, an order of the Court must be entered to that effect within the thirty day period. See Hendrickson v. United States, 791 F.3d 354, 358 (2d Cir. 2015). Any pending motions are moot and shall be terminated.

The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate all pending motions, vacate all remaining conference dates and other deadlines, and close this case.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Maury v. Ventura in Manhattan, Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jul 11, 2022
18-CV-7496 (RWL) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 11, 2022)
Case details for

Maury v. Ventura in Manhattan, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:JULIE MAURY, Plaintiff, v. VENTURA IN MANHATTAN, INC., et al Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Jul 11, 2022

Citations

18-CV-7496 (RWL) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 11, 2022)