From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Maury v. Tribeca Grand Hotel, Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 16, 2022
19-cv-5277 (ER) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 16, 2022)

Opinion

19-cv-5277 (ER)

12-16-2022

JULIE MAURY, Plaintiff, v. TRIBECA GRAND HOTEL, INC., and HARTZ HOTEL SERVICES, INC., Defendants.


ORDER

EDGARDO RAMOS, U.S.D.J.

The Court having been advised that all claims asserted herein have been settled, it is ORDERED, that the above-entitled action be and hereby is discontinued, without costs to either party, subject to reopening should the settlement not be consummated within thirty (30) days of the date hereof.

Any application to reopen must be filed within thirty (30) days of this Order; any application to reopen filed thereafter may be denied solely on that basis. Further, the parties are advised that if they wish the Court to retain jurisdiction in this matter for purposes of enforcing any settlement agreement, they must submit the settlement agreement to the Court within the next thirty (30) days with a request that the agreement be “so ordered” by the Court.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Maury v. Tribeca Grand Hotel, Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 16, 2022
19-cv-5277 (ER) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 16, 2022)
Case details for

Maury v. Tribeca Grand Hotel, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:JULIE MAURY, Plaintiff, v. TRIBECA GRAND HOTEL, INC., and HARTZ HOTEL…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Dec 16, 2022

Citations

19-cv-5277 (ER) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 16, 2022)