From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mauro v. Administrator

Superior Court, New Haven County
Dec 29, 1954
19 Conn. Supp. 362 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1954)

Opinion

File No. 80848

Where the plaintiff gave his employer notice that he would resign but later attempted to withdraw his resignation, and his employer, who had filled the position, would not consider the withdrawal, the plaintiff did not become voluntarily unemployed. He was not ineligible, during the statutory period, for unemployment benefits as a person who has "left work without sufficient cause connected with his employment."

Memorandum filed December 29, 1954.

Memorandum on appeal from decision of unemployment commissioner. Appeal dismissed.

Vincent Villano, of New Haven, for the plaintiff.

William L. Beers, attorney general, and Harry Silverstone, assistant attorney general, of Hartford, for the defendant.


The claimant gave his employer notice that he would resign as of July 1, 1954; the employer hired a replacement June 16; on June 21 claimant decided that he would not take the job which he had in contemplation in New Jersey, and on June 23 he attempted to withdraw his resignation. The company told him his job was already filled and that they would not consider the withdrawal. He left his work on July 1, 1954.

The disqualification contained in General Statutes, § 7508(2)(a) (as amended, Cum. Sup. 1953, § 2313c), of a person who has left work without sufficient cause connected with his employment is in accord with the general theory of unemployment compensation laws, which is that compensation is to be provided for unemployment which is involuntary on the part of the employee. Consiglio v. Administrator, 137 Conn. 693, 696. If the claimant had actually left the employment to accept a better job, he would undoubtedly be ineligible for benefits during the statutory period, at least in the absence of a finding that his work was unsuitable because of the amount of remuneration or otherwise. Consiglio v. Administrator, supra. This was not the case. At the time he left the job, his leaving was not voluntary, it was involuntary. His status never ripened into that of a person who has voluntarily become unemployed.


Summaries of

Mauro v. Administrator

Superior Court, New Haven County
Dec 29, 1954
19 Conn. Supp. 362 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1954)
Case details for

Mauro v. Administrator

Case Details

Full title:DOMINIC MAURO v. ADMINISTRATOR, UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION ACT

Court:Superior Court, New Haven County

Date published: Dec 29, 1954

Citations

19 Conn. Supp. 362 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1954)
113 A.2d 866

Citing Cases

Guy Gannett Pub. Co. v. Maine Employment Sec. Com'n

180 A.2d at 124. By contrast, in Mauro v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation Act, 19 Conn. Sup. 362,…

Cotright v. Doyal

" The court went further to point out that the interpretation so given was in accord with the provisions of…