From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mauricio v. Tiramisu Rest.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jun 2, 2022
22-cv-2500 (MKV) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 2, 2022)

Opinion

22-cv-2500 (MKV)

06-02-2022

JUAN LOPEZ MAURICIO, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. TIRAMISU RESTAURANT, LLC, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

MARY KAY VYSKOCIL, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE:

The Court is in receipt of letters from counsel [ECF Nos. 16, 18, 19] in response to the Court's Order To Show Cause dated May 24, 2022. The Court finds that it is not necessary or appropriate to impose sanctions at this time. Counsel and the parties are on notice that future failures to comply with court orders may result in sanctions, including monetary sanctions, preclusion of claims, defenses, and evidence, and dismissal of this action with prejudice for failure to prosecute.

The Court is also in receipt of the parties' joint letter and proposed Case Management Plan [ECF Nos. 15, 17]. After carefully reviewing those submissions, the Court has concluded that a telephonic Initial Pretrial Conference is not necessary. Accordingly, the IPTC that was scheduled to take place on June 3, 2022 is adjourned sine die.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Mauricio v. Tiramisu Rest.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jun 2, 2022
22-cv-2500 (MKV) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 2, 2022)
Case details for

Mauricio v. Tiramisu Rest.

Case Details

Full title:JUAN LOPEZ MAURICIO, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Jun 2, 2022

Citations

22-cv-2500 (MKV) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 2, 2022)