From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Maurice v. Butler

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Aug 25, 2011
10 Civ. 5370 (DAB) (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 25, 2011)

Opinion

10 Civ. 5370 (DAB).

August 25, 2011


ADOPTION OF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION


This matter is before the Court upon the July 25, 2011 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Debra C. Freeman (the "Report"). Judge Freeman's Report recommends that Plaintiff's Complaint be dismissed, without prejudice, pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

"Within fourteen days after being served with a copy [of a Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation], a party may serve and file specific written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations." Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b)(2); accord 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). The district court may adopt those portions of the report to which no timely objection has been made, so long as there is no clear error on the face of the record. Wilds v. United Parcel Serv., Inc., 262 F.Supp.2d 163, 169 (S.D.N.Y. 2003). "[F]ailure to object timely to a magistrate's report operates as a waiver of any further judicial review of the magistrate's decision." Caidor v. Onondaga County, 517 F.3d 601, 604 (2d Cir. 2008) (quoting Small v. Sec. of HHS, 892 F.2d 15, 16 (2d Cir. 1989)). This rule applies to pro se parties so long as the magistrate's report "explicitly states that failure to object to the report within [fourteen (14)] days will preclude appellate review . . ." Small, 892 F.2d at 16.

Despite being advised of the procedure for filing objections in Judge Freeman's Report, and warned that failure to file objections would waive objections and preclude appellate review, (Report at 3), Plaintiff has filed no objections to the Report. Nor has any other Party filed objections to the Report.

Having reviewed the Report, and finding no clear error on the face of the record, see 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Debra C. Freeman, dated July 25, 2011, be and the same hereby is APPROVED, ADOPTED, and RATIFIED by the Court in its entirety. Plaintiff's Complaint is HEREBY DISMISSED, without prejudice, pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Clerk is DIRECTED to close the docket in this case.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Maurice v. Butler

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Aug 25, 2011
10 Civ. 5370 (DAB) (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 25, 2011)
Case details for

Maurice v. Butler

Case Details

Full title:JEAN MARC MAURICE, Plaintiff, v. C.O. CAPT. BUTLER, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Aug 25, 2011

Citations

10 Civ. 5370 (DAB) (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 25, 2011)