From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Maurer v. Marcus & Partners, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 2, 2011
CASE NO.: C11-03580 CW (N.D. Cal. Nov. 2, 2011)

Opinion

CASE NO.: C11-03580 CW

11-02-2011

JEREMY D. MAURER Plaintiff(s), v. MARCUS & PARTNERS, INC., STEVEN A. BOOSKA, SHEVGUR LLC d/b/a/ BORROWLENSES.COM Defendant(s).

Brondon L. Reeves Attorney for Defendant MARCUS & PARTNERS, INC. Elliabeth Brekhas Attorney for Defendant SHEVGUR LLC d/b/a BORROWLENSES.COM Steven A. booska Attorney for Defendant STEVEN A. BOOSKA


STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS

Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil LR. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:

The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:

Court Processes:
[] Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)
[×] Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADRL.R.5)
[] Mediation (ADR L,R. 6)
(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR, must participate in an ADR phone conference and may not file this form, They must instead file a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5)
Private Process:
[] Private ADR (please identify process and provider) _____________
The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:
[×] the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered.)
[] other requested deadline _____________

In Pro Persona

Brondon L. Reeves

Attorney for Defendant MARCUS & PARTNERS, INC.

Elliabeth Brekhas

Attorney for Defendant SHEVGUR LLC

d/b/a BORROWLENSES.COM

Steven A. booska

Attorney for Defendant STEVEN A. BOOSKA
When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate ADR Docket Event, e.g., "Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Early Neutral Evaluation."

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Pursuant to the Stipulation above, the captioned matter is hereby referred to:

[] Non-binding Arbitration
[×] Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE)
[] Mediation
[] Private ADR
Deadline for ADR session
[×] 90 days from the date of this order.
[] other _____________

IT IS SO ORDERED.

__________________________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, Maria Gutierrez, declare:

I am a citizen of the United States, am over the age of eighteen years, and am not a party to or interested in the within entitled cause. My business address is 555 University Avenue, Suite 200 East, Sacramento, CA 95825.

On October 26, 2011, I served the following document(s) on the parties in the within action:

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS (ENE)

+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ ¦ ¦VIA ELECTRONIC SERVICE: The above-described document ¦ ¦ ¦(s) will be delivered electronically through the ¦ ¦X ¦Court's ECF/PACER electronic filing system, as ¦ ¦ ¦stipulated by all parties to constitute personal ¦ ¦ ¦service, to the following: ¦ +-----------------------------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦Steven A. Booska ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦Law Offices of Steven A. ¦ ¦ ¦Booska ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦Attorneys for In Pro Persona ¦ ¦25 Kearny Street ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦Suite 500 ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦San Francisco, CA 94108 ¦ ¦ +--------------------------+--------------------------------------------------¦ ¦Elizabeth Brekhus Brekhus ¦Attorneys for ¦ ¦Law Partners 1000 Drakes ¦ ¦ ¦Landing Road Greenbrae, CA¦Defendant SHEVGUR LLC d/b/a BORROWLENSES.COM ¦ ¦94904 ¦ ¦ +-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ ¦ ¦BY MAIL: I am familiar with the business practice for ¦ ¦ ¦collection and processing of mail. The above-described document¦ ¦X ¦(s) will be enclosed in a sealed envelope, with first class ¦ ¦ ¦postage thereon fully prepaid, and deposited with the United ¦ ¦ ¦States Postal Service at Sacramento, CA on this date, addressed¦ ¦ ¦as follows: ¦ +-----------------------------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦Jeremy Maurer ¦ ¦ ¦P.O. Box 70474 ¦Attorneys for In Pro Persona ¦ ¦Oakland, CA ¦ ¦ ¦94612 ¦ ¦ +-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is a true and correct statement and that this Certificate was executed on October 26, 2011.

By: _____________

Maria Gutierrez


Summaries of

Maurer v. Marcus & Partners, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 2, 2011
CASE NO.: C11-03580 CW (N.D. Cal. Nov. 2, 2011)
Case details for

Maurer v. Marcus & Partners, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:JEREMY D. MAURER Plaintiff(s), v. MARCUS & PARTNERS, INC., STEVEN A…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Nov 2, 2011

Citations

CASE NO.: C11-03580 CW (N.D. Cal. Nov. 2, 2011)