From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Maune v. Wittenborn

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Jan 13, 2009
273 S.W.3d 554 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009)

Opinion

No. ED90911.

November 25, 2008. Rehearing Denied January 13, 2009.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Franklin County, 02CV331665, Stanley D. Williams, Judge.

Terry J. Flanagan, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.

Stephen Keith Paulus, Cuba, MO, for Respondent.

Before BOOKER T. SHAW, P.J., and KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J., and MARY K. HOFF, J.

Prior report: 2008 WL 4325847.



ORDER


Preston Wittenborn appeals from the trial court's judgment, which was based on an earlier default judgment, entered in favor of Jeffrey Maune. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claim of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. Rule 84.16(b)(5). An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Maune v. Wittenborn

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Jan 13, 2009
273 S.W.3d 554 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009)
Case details for

Maune v. Wittenborn

Case Details

Full title:Jeffrey MAUNE, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Preston WITTENBORN…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District

Date published: Jan 13, 2009

Citations

273 S.W.3d 554 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009)