From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Maule v. Biter

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 22, 2011
1:11-CV-00486 GSA HC (E.D. Cal. Sep. 22, 2011)

Opinion

1:11-CV-00486 GSA HC

09-22-2011

ROBBY LEE MAULE, Petitioner, v. M. D. BITER, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER DIRECTING RESPONDENT TO

COMPLETE AND RETURN

CONSENT/DECLINE FORM


[Docs. #6, 8]

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. He has consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).

On May 3, 2011, the Court issued a scheduling order which, among other things, directed Respondent to file a consent/decline form within thirty (30) days. Over thirty (30) days have passed, and Respondent has not complied.

Accordingly, Respondent is ORDERED to file a consent/decline form within fifteen (15) days of the date of service of this Order. Failure to comply with this Order may result in sanctions pursuant to Local Rule 110 and Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Gary S. Austin

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Maule v. Biter

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 22, 2011
1:11-CV-00486 GSA HC (E.D. Cal. Sep. 22, 2011)
Case details for

Maule v. Biter

Case Details

Full title:ROBBY LEE MAULE, Petitioner, v. M. D. BITER, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 22, 2011

Citations

1:11-CV-00486 GSA HC (E.D. Cal. Sep. 22, 2011)