From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mauldin v. Stansberry

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jun 29, 2007
242 F. App'x 31 (4th Cir. 2007)

Opinion

No. 07-6643.

Submitted: June 21, 2007.

Decided: June 29, 2007.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (5:07-hc-02002).

Alfred Lee Mauldin, Appellant Pro Se.

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.


Affirmed as modified by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Alfred Lee Mauldin seeks to appeal the district court's order dismissing his 28 U.S.C § 2241 (2000) petition so he may refile it as an action under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Mauldin v. Stansberry, No. 5:07-hc-02002 (E.D.N.C. Apr. 5, 2007). We modify the district court's order, however, to reflect that the dismissal is without prejudice. We deny Mauldin's motions to consolidate this appeal with No. 07-6199, an unrelated appeal pending in this court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED.


Summaries of

Mauldin v. Stansberry

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jun 29, 2007
242 F. App'x 31 (4th Cir. 2007)
Case details for

Mauldin v. Stansberry

Case Details

Full title:Alfred Lee MAULDIN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Patricia STANSBERRY, Warden…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Jun 29, 2007

Citations

242 F. App'x 31 (4th Cir. 2007)