From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Maucher v. Hartzheim

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 23, 1907
121 App. Div. 588 (N.Y. App. Div. 1907)

Opinion

October 23, 1907.

C.W. Wilson, Jr., for the appellant.

Ferd W. Buermeyer, for the respondent.


The plaintiff made a requisition on the defendant, who is the clerk of Kings county, for a search against "Catherine Joyce, wife of Edward Joyce", and this action is against the said clerk for damages for negligence in omitting from his return a judgment against Cassie Joyce. "Cassie" is said to be a diminution of Catherine, like Katie, but if it be it is not generally known or used as such. We are referred to no authority which would sustain the conclusion that the omission of the judgment was negligence.

The judgment is affirmed.

HIRSCHBERG, P.J., WOODWARD, RICH and MILLER, JJ., concurred.

Judgment of the Municipal Court affirmed, with costs.


Summaries of

Maucher v. Hartzheim

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 23, 1907
121 App. Div. 588 (N.Y. App. Div. 1907)
Case details for

Maucher v. Hartzheim

Case Details

Full title:FRANK G. MAUCHER, Appellant, v . CHARLES T. HARTZHEIM, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 23, 1907

Citations

121 App. Div. 588 (N.Y. App. Div. 1907)
106 N.Y.S. 371