From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matveeva v. The City of New York

Supreme Court of New York
Jan 6, 2022
2022 N.Y. Slip Op. 46 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2022)

Opinion

Appeal No. 14963 Index No. 450675/16Case No. 2021-03204

01-06-2022

Miroslava Matveeva, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The City of New York, Defendant-Respondent, Alliance for Downtown New York, Inc., et al., Defendants. Appeal No. 14963 No. 2021-03204

Law Offices of William Pager, Brooklyn (William Pager of counsel), for appellant. Georgia M. Pestana, Corporation Counsel, New York (John Moore of counsel), for respondent.


Law Offices of William Pager, Brooklyn (William Pager of counsel), for appellant.

Georgia M. Pestana, Corporation Counsel, New York (John Moore of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Webber, J.P., Friedman, Oing, Moulton, Kennedy, JJ.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Dakota D. Ramseur, J.), entered April 9, 2021, which granted the defendant City of New York's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims against it, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff alleges that she was injured when she tripped and fell on a wooden board that was part of a temporary recreational program set up at Coenties Slip Plaza. The motion court properly concluded that plaintiff's action was subject to the prior written notice requirement set forth in Administrative Code of City of NY § 7-201(c)(2), since the plaza in which plaintiff fell can be characterized as a public way, public place, or pedestrian walk, and therefore falls within the definition of "street" or "sidewalk" in Administrative Code of City of NY § 7-201(c)(1)(a) and (b). Because the City established that it did not receive prior written notice of a defective condition in that area, it cannot be held liable (see Tomashevskaya v City of New York, 161 A.D.3d 511, 512 [1st Dept 2018]).

In addition, plaintiff failed to provide evidence sufficient to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether the City received notice of the condition, caused or created the condition, or made special use of the area.

We have considered plaintiff's remaining contentions to the extent preserved and find them unavailing.


Summaries of

Matveeva v. The City of New York

Supreme Court of New York
Jan 6, 2022
2022 N.Y. Slip Op. 46 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2022)
Case details for

Matveeva v. The City of New York

Case Details

Full title:Miroslava Matveeva, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The City of New York…

Court:Supreme Court of New York

Date published: Jan 6, 2022

Citations

2022 N.Y. Slip Op. 46 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2022)