From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matute v. Holland

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EASTERN DIVISION
Nov 30, 2015
No. ED CV 15-894-RSWL (PLA) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 30, 2015)

Opinion

No. ED CV 15-894-RSWL (PLA)

11-30-2015

DARWIN CASTRO MATUTE, Petitioner, v. KIM HOLLAND, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, all the records and files herein, and the magistrate judge's report and recommendation. The Court accepts the recommendations of the magistrate judge.

ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED:

1. The report and recommendation is accepted.

2. Judgment shall be entered consistent with this order.

3. The clerk shall serve this order and the judgment on all counsel or parties of record. DATED: 11-30-2015

s/ RONALD S.W. LEW

HONORABLE RONALD S.W. LEW

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Matute v. Holland

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EASTERN DIVISION
Nov 30, 2015
No. ED CV 15-894-RSWL (PLA) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 30, 2015)
Case details for

Matute v. Holland

Case Details

Full title:DARWIN CASTRO MATUTE, Petitioner, v. KIM HOLLAND, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Nov 30, 2015

Citations

No. ED CV 15-894-RSWL (PLA) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 30, 2015)