From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mattson v. Continental Ins. Co.

Minnesota Court of Appeals
Jun 19, 1984
349 N.W.2d 605 (Minn. Ct. App. 1984)

Opinion

No. C2-84-512.

June 19, 1984.

Appeal from the District Court, Washington County, John F. Thoreen, J.

Michael S. Kreidler, Minneapolis, for appellant.

Jeffrey R. Anderson, St. Paul, for respondent.

Considered and decided by WOZNIAK, P.J., HUSPENI and NIERENGARTEN, JJ., with oral argument waived.


OPINION


Continental Insurance Company argues that, since the legislature has repealed the underinsured motorist coverage section of the No-Fault Act, they are free to exclude stacking of benefits. In Sobania v. Integrity Mutual Insurance Co., 349 N.W.2d 345 (Minn.Ct.App. 1984), this court held that the repeal did not change the nature of underinsured motorist coverage and, therefore, attempted "anti-stacking" exclusions, such as the one in this case, are void.

DECISION

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Mattson v. Continental Ins. Co.

Minnesota Court of Appeals
Jun 19, 1984
349 N.W.2d 605 (Minn. Ct. App. 1984)
Case details for

Mattson v. Continental Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:David MATTSON, Respondent, v. CONTINENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant

Court:Minnesota Court of Appeals

Date published: Jun 19, 1984

Citations

349 N.W.2d 605 (Minn. Ct. App. 1984)

Citing Cases

Mattson v. Continental Ins. Co.

Appellant Continental Insurance Company (Continental) appeals from a summary judgment declaring respondent…