From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mattingly v. Justice

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Aug 22, 2024
24-cv-03061-EMC (N.D. Cal. Aug. 22, 2024)

Opinion

24-cv-03061-EMC

08-22-2024

MARGURIETE MATTINGLY, Plaintiff, v. HILLARY CARLVIN JUSTICE, Defendant.


CORRECTED ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS ON APPEAL

DOCKET NO. 23

EDWARD M. CHEN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Previously, the Court granted Plaintiff's motion to remand. Defendant has now appealed that ruling and has asked for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal.

The Court denies the motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal on the basis that the appeal is frivolous.

The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this order on the parties and the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Mattingly v. Justice

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Aug 22, 2024
24-cv-03061-EMC (N.D. Cal. Aug. 22, 2024)
Case details for

Mattingly v. Justice

Case Details

Full title:MARGURIETE MATTINGLY, Plaintiff, v. HILLARY CARLVIN JUSTICE, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Aug 22, 2024

Citations

24-cv-03061-EMC (N.D. Cal. Aug. 22, 2024)