From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mattikow v. United Jersey Mortgage Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 22, 1984
104 A.D.2d 973 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)

Opinion

October 22, 1984

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Putnam County (Beisheim, J.).


Judgment affirmed, insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Plaintiff's letter of August 14, 1979 identified the parties to the contract and the property which was the subject of the transaction, set out the price and detailed the terms of payment (see Birnhak v Vaccaro, 47 A.D.2d 915). As such, plaintiff's offer set out all of the essential terms of a contract with reasonable definiteness. Accordingly, a valid and enforceable contract was created when appellant accepted the offer on August 20, 1979 (see Tymon v Linoki, 16 N.Y.2d 293). Although a down payment of $30,000 was due upon execution of a formal contract, plaintiff's failure to pay that sum did not constitute a breach of contract since no formal contract was executed.

Under all the circumstances, the damages awarded by the court were reasonable. Mollen, P.J., Lazer, Gibbons and Brown, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Mattikow v. United Jersey Mortgage Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 22, 1984
104 A.D.2d 973 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)
Case details for

Mattikow v. United Jersey Mortgage Co.

Case Details

Full title:ALFRED H. MATTIKOW, Respondent, v. UNITED JERSEY MORTGAGE CO., Defendant…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 22, 1984

Citations

104 A.D.2d 973 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)

Citing Cases

Boucher v. Walker

There are numerous Second Department cases in which binders or similar memoranda were found enforceable even…

Boucher v. Walker

There are numerous Second Department cases in which binders or similar memoranda were found enforceable even…