From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mattice v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
May 30, 2001
786 So. 2d 1201 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

Opinion

Case No. 2D01-31.

Opinion filed May 30, 2001.

Appeal pursuant to Fla.R.App.P.9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Jack Espinosa, Jr., Judge.


Mark A. Mattice appeals the summary denial of his motion to correct sentence in which he alleged his sentence was erroneously run consecutive to the sentence he received in case number 96-1625. It is clear from the record that the parties and the court below agreed that the sentence Mattice received in the instant case, lower court case number 97-2017, would run concurrent to the sentence he received in case number 96-1625. We therefore reverse the trial court and remand this case. See Barber v. State, 590 So.2d 527 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991). On remand, the trial court shall resentence Mattice in the instant case to a sentence of one year and one day in prison, with credit for time served, to run concurrent to his sentence in case number 96-1625.

Reversed and remanded.

BLUE and DAVIS, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

Mattice v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
May 30, 2001
786 So. 2d 1201 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)
Case details for

Mattice v. State

Case Details

Full title:MARK A. MATTICE, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: May 30, 2001

Citations

786 So. 2d 1201 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)