From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matthias v. Hogan

United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Mar 31, 2008
Civil Action No. 4:CV-07-1987 (M.D. Pa. Mar. 31, 2008)

Summary

finding that petitioner's 7-month detention did not warrant a hearing even though removal proceedings were ongoing

Summary of this case from Alli v. Decker

Opinion

Civil Action No. 4:CV-07-1987.

March 31, 2008


ORDER


BACKGROUND:

On October 30, 2007, petitioner Michael Andrew Matthias, in the custody of ICE at York County Prison, York Pennsylvania, filed the instant petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. In the petition, Matthias appears to challenge his detention by ICE and the denial of bond by the Immigration Judge (IJ).

The matter was initially referred to United States Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Blewitt. On March 7, 2008, the magistrate judge filed an eighteen-page report recommending that the petition be dismissed. (Rec. Doc. No. 12.) Specifically, the magistrate judge concluded that petitioner's claim must fail because he is subject to mandatory detention under § 236(c) of the Immigration and Nationality Act. (Id. at 11-12.)

No objections have been filed to the report and recommendation. Because petitioner has elected not to object to the report and recommendation and because we agree with the magistrate judge's analysis and recommendation, we will adopt the report and recommendation in full. For the purposes of judicial economy, we will not rehash the sound reasoning employed by the magistrate judge. We agree with the magistrate judge's thorough analysis that petitioner is not entitled to bail due to his prior conviction for an aggravated felony. Therefore, the petition must be denied.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

1. United States Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Blewitt's Report and Recommendation is adopted in full. (Rec. Doc. No. 12.)
2. Matthias' habeas petition is denied.
3. The clerk is directed to close the case file.


Summaries of

Matthias v. Hogan

United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Mar 31, 2008
Civil Action No. 4:CV-07-1987 (M.D. Pa. Mar. 31, 2008)

finding that petitioner's 7-month detention did not warrant a hearing even though removal proceedings were ongoing

Summary of this case from Alli v. Decker

clarifying that the date of a criminal alien's release from state criminal custody on the conduct subjecting him to removal determines whether Section 236(c) applies.

Summary of this case from Pulido-Rodriguez v. Sabol

In Matthias v. Hogan, Civ. Action No. 4:07-CV-1987, 2008 WL 913522 (M.D.Pa. Mar. 31, 2008) (McClure, J.), the court denied habeas relief after considering the Madrane analysis.

Summary of this case from Prince v. Mukasey
Case details for

Matthias v. Hogan

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL ANDREW MATTHIAS, Petitioner, v. THOMAS HOGAN, et al. Respondents

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Mar 31, 2008

Citations

Civil Action No. 4:CV-07-1987 (M.D. Pa. Mar. 31, 2008)

Citing Cases

Tkochenko v. Sabol

Thus, once a final order of removal is entered, the due process protections afforded to aliens by Zadvydas v.…

Sengkeo v. Horgan

May 29, 2008) (fourteen months); Madrane, 520 F.Supp.2d at 666-67 (three years); Diomande v. Wrona, No.…